Skip to content

OJOPYSee pricing

BEdificio residencialMADES signal: Very recentCommercial match: Already public · 1336 days earlierEvidence: Public sources cross-checked

Edificio residencial · Gran Asunción

Signal PUB-PY-16

Gran Asunción · identity withheld

Research state and readingResearch state: Critical review. Current reading: Compare.

Why this signal deserves a closer look: Risk flags to cross-check

Reasons for this reading

8/8 applicable dimensions have public data (100% weighted coverage).
1 internal risk/evidence criterion is not met.
The MADES signal is «Very recent MADES».
The commercial match is «Already public · 1336 days earlier».

Unresolved gaps

This reading identifies no additional gaps; it does not validate the brief.

Next validation: Resolve the unmet criterion and its source document first; do not proceed on this reading alone.

What would change the reading: Would move to “Investigate further” with grade A/S, ≥70% documentary confidence and cross-checked public sources.

What OJOPY does not know: OJOPY does not know or validate title, municipal construction permits, commercial availability, or contract terms.

🔒 Identity and detailed sources remain reserved for the Evidence Brief.

Create account and open · US$24 → Watch Compare this signal

Signal index

52/100

Ordinal engine index; not a probability or appraisal.

Public-source coverage

8/8 dimensions with public data. It measures coverage, not official approval or probability of success.

Reading

Worth a look

MADES signal

Very recent MADESMADES date and traceable source available in the Evidence Brief.

Commercial match

Already public · 1336 days earlierAn attributed commercial listing is dated before the MADES source.

Risk pressure

High

Why this grade: the signal score · next ceiling: below the quality floor for top grades (risk/confidence/coverage).

🔒 The engine detected cross-signal checks that affect the index. Their detail and impact are in the Evidence Brief.

The analysis, dimension by dimension 8/8 with data · coverage 100% · ⓘ explains what it measures · tap each bar for why

LocationⓘMediumwhy

Observed access, services, and micro-zone context.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Timing contextⓘMediumwhy

Timing contribution to the index; MADES recency and commercial matching keep separate states.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Short-stay rentⓘmicro-zone · US$75/night · FuerteMediumwhy

Context from comparable short-stay listings in the area.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

DeveloperⓘMediumwhy

Developer public record: activity and background visible in the sources.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Public documentary trailⓘMediumwhy

Traceable filings, declarations and business identity.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Market tractionⓘHighwhy

Public and commercial activity observed during the measured period.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Resale liquidityⓘHighwhy

Observed stock and turnover as an area market proxy.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Supply slackⓘLowwhy

Comparable inventory competing in the area at capture time.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

The public view already shows the global ordinal index; the Evidence Brief adds per-dimension factors and the sources that exist. “no data” = no public source for that dimension in this signal (not 0: we don’t make it up). What your Evidence Brief unlocks: the traceable sources available for this capture, the declared developer identity, exact location when present, and reasoned flags.

🔒 Developer’s official website, video and brochures/floor plans in your Evidence Brief — they identify the developer.

Location approximate zone · ~5 km radius · exact in Evidence Brief

Documented chronology

MADES signalVery recent MADESMADES date and traceable source available in the Evidence Brief.

Commercial matchAlready public · 1336 days earlierAn attributed commercial listing is dated before the MADES source.

The attributed commercial listing predates MADES. OJOPY records that it was already public and does not claim a lead.

🔒 Traceable dates and sources in your Evidence Brief.

Public evidence (MADES + registry)

Developer🔒 withheld

SignalConstrucción nueva · additional construction trail

Year2026

Cadastral account🔒

Registry entries🔒

Units—

Public record of the DeveloperActiva

🔒 Declared documentary identity (Developer + cadastral account + registry entries, when present) — revealed in your Evidence Brief so your notary can cross-check it at the public registry.

Project contact & source

Official website🔒

MADES case file🔒

Source record🔒

Study responsible🔒

🔒 The full identity and sources in your Evidence Brief: developer website, MADES case file and source record, and the environmental study reference. Corporate phone and social links where the public source provides them.

Market · cross-portal data

Comparables in micro-zone232

Zone price/m²US$1,839–2,487/m²

Portal comparables2 portals · zone

Competing supplyLow

We cross the MADES signal with portal listings from the same micro-zone. Free view shows the price range; the exact median and comparable detail are in your Evidence Brief.

Internal risk and evidence checks

Engine: state is not Alert · criterion metWith the public evidence observed, the result meets this internal criterion; it does not certify the project.

Risk < 60 · criterion not metWith the public evidence observed, the result does not meet this internal criterion; review the risk or missing evidence before proceeding.

Coverage ≥ 50 · criterion metWith the public evidence observed, the result meets this internal criterion; it does not certify the project.

Not sponsored · criterion metWith the public evidence observed, the result meets this internal criterion; it does not certify the project.

🔒 What to request to review internal criteria that are not met (documents and concrete checks), in your Evidence Brief.

Zone risk (geo) DEM + OSM + MADES · geo risk weighs on the score

≈

Flood · Mediumderived from elevation + watercourses · geo-data confidence: high · already discounted in the score (ZONE risk, not the developer's)

⚠

Env. hazards · Highnearest at 313 m · combustible, industrial (MADES licences) · already discounted in the score (ZONE risk, not the developer's)

▲

Elevation · 122 mwatercourse at 668 m

History · evidence, market and model

Oct 02Nuevos comparables en la microzona (224 → 232)

🔒 3 recorded changes — the project tracking (full change history) is in your Evidence Brief.

This is a radar signal

We located it in public sources. Open its Evidence Brief to see the paid fields that actually exist for this capture, while every missing item remains explicit. See an audited real case →

Declared project and developer identityDeveloper, project name, and registry identifiers when present.

Traceable source for every data pointLinks and references actually present in this capture.

A reading of each dimension and its observed factorsBreakdown of 8/8 applicable dimensions with data; missing evidence stays marked.

Contradictions and reasoned flagsEvidence behind risk pressure and every internal criterion not met.

Available comparablesMedian and dispersion from 232 micro-zone comparables.

Missing data + questions for the seller / notaryResolve the unmet criterion and its source document first; do not proceed on this reading alone.

History availablePreserved changes to this signal and its reading.

Create your account or sign in before paying.This binds the brief to the right account and prevents duplicate charges.

Create account and continue · US$24 →

Already have an account? Sign in. Or the Pase (US$49/mo) opens them all.

Material-error guarantee: if a data point we gave as verified against its public source was wrong and changes the reading, we fix it free; if it invalidates the Brief, we refund your US$24.

Anonymised public signal — company name withheld until your Evidence Brief, never personal data. OJOPY is not a broker and does not sell real estate; it does not guarantee returns. The analysis reduces information asymmetry — it does not eliminate risk. Methodology · Legal.