What the signal supported
- An identifiable public environmental source existed.
- The project was described as a residential building in Luque.
- The source declared 153 apartments and 6 levels.
- The entity showed prior activity in public filings.
Retrospective Evidence Brief · audited 15 Jul 2026
This is what we saw. This is what we did not know. This is what happened next.
This is not a hand-picked success story. We audit three outcomes: a signal that preceded dated listings, one that was already public, and a portal match that failed.
Reading ruleA source date is not the date OJOPY detected it. OJOPY's first snapshot for Insignia 8 and Venire is dated 22 June 2026; Aura had no stored score history on the audit date. We do not claim OJOPY detected them in 2025.
Earlier signalMain case
Insignia 8 · Luque
The environmental source predates two attributable commercial listings. That proves a documentary window in this case; it does not prove the first commercial appearance anywhere online.
Environmental sourceProject, 153 apartments and 6 levels declared.
+68 daysDated commercial listingListing updated with price, unit type, and amenities.
+163 daysInfoCasasEntry date attributed by the portal itself.
OJOPY ingestion: first stored snapshot on 22 Jun 2026. The 2025 dates describe the sources, not contemporaneous product detection.
What it did not establish
- That a municipal construction permit existed.
- That title, liens, or the cadastral account had been validated.
- That construction would advance, be delivered, or meet price and timing.
- That the 30 August listing was the first commercial visibility.
Buyer-relevant finding
The environmental source described 153 apartments; InfoCasas describes 165 units and 4 towers. This may be an expansion, a different version, or a listing error. We do not resolve it by inference: it becomes a documentary question for the seller and notary.
Two cases that prevent a perfect story
Venire Las Lomas
The commercial article is dated 25 September 2023. The environmental source is dated 12 August 2025: 687 days later. There is no documentary first-look here, and OJOPY must not present one.
Aura Japandi Residences
The feed did not attribute a portal date and Aura had no stored OJOPY score history, but we found a listing updated 28 October 2025. The environmental source is dated 9 December 2025: 42 days later. This is a matching false negative, not absence from the market.
Evidence outranks the story
1An environmental signal never equals construction, a municipal permit, clean title, or a buying opportunity.
2Timing advantage is only shown against a specific dated commercial source, never against the whole market.
3Not located means the matching process did not find it; it does not prove absence.
4Conflicts between sources become verifiable questions, not an invented answer.
Now read the radar with this ruleCoverage, risk, and timing first. The ordinal index remains a secondary aid.
See real signals →