What the signal supported
- An identifiable public environmental source existed.
- The project was described as a residential building in Luque.
- The source declared 153 apartments and 6 levels.
- The entity showed prior activity in public filings.
Retrospective Evidence Brief · audited 15 Jul 2026
The environmental source appeared 68 days before the dated listing.
For Insignia 8, cross-checking sources also revealed a difference between 153 and 165 units. Here are the dates, documents, and questions that contradiction raises. We then show two controls where the timing edge did not exist.
Reading ruleA source date is not the date OJOPY detected it. OJOPY's first snapshot for Insignia 8 and Venire is dated 22 June 2026; Aura had no stored score history on the audit date. We do not claim OJOPY detected them in 2025.
Earlier signalMain case
Insignia 8 · Luque
The timeline opens one concrete question before buying: what changed between the environmental version of the project and the later commercial offer? The documentary window is verifiable against these dated sources.
Environmental sourceProject, 153 apartments and 6 levels declared.
+68 daysDated commercial listingListing updated with price, unit type, and amenities.
+163 daysInfoCasasEntry date attributed by the portal itself.
OJOPY ingestion: first stored snapshot on 22 Jun 2026. The 2025 dates describe the sources, not contemporaneous product detection.
What it did not establish
- That a municipal construction permit existed.
- That title, liens, or the cadastral account had been validated.
- That construction would advance, be delivered, or meet price and timing.
- That the 30 August listing was the first commercial visibility.
Buyer-relevant finding
The environmental source described 153 apartments; InfoCasas describes 165 units and 4 towers. This may be an expansion, a different version, or a listing error. We do not resolve it by inference: it becomes a documentary question for the seller and notary.
Two cases that prevent a perfect story
Venire Las Lomas
The commercial article is dated 25 September 2023. The environmental source is dated 12 August 2025: 687 days later. There is no documentary first-look here, and OJOPY must not present one.
Aura Japandi Residences
The feed did not attribute a portal date and Aura had no stored OJOPY score history, but we found a listing updated 28 October 2025. The environmental source is dated 9 December 2025: 42 days later. This is a matching false negative, not absence from the market.
Evidence outranks the story
1An environmental signal never equals construction, a municipal permit, clean title, or a buying opportunity.
2Timing advantage is only shown against a specific dated commercial source, never against the whole market.
3Not located means the matching process did not find it; it does not prove absence.
4Conflicts between sources become verifiable questions, not an invented answer.
Now read the radar with this ruleCoverage, risk, and chronology first. The ordinal index remains a secondary aid.
See real signals →Continue with a concrete verification
Six related routes, selected by function rather than volume.
01Explore construction and land signalsPublic records, dates, coverage, and gaps for each signal.02Cross-check observed commercial offersPublished price and area with visible sources and limitations.03Compare zones with dated evidenceDistribution, freshness, and contexts that may remain unmeasured.04Review the due-diligence guideWhich document to request for each claim before committing.05Understand the methodology and its limitsDefinitions, evidence states, pairing, and confidence.06Prepare a purchase from abroadTitle, cadastre, permits, and the border-zone exception with sources.