Skip to content

OJOPYSee the radar

DLoteamientoScoop: CoolingEvidence: Public sources cross-checked

Loteamiento · Paraguarí

Signal SUELO-PY-69

Paraguarí · identity withheld

Signal index

30/100

Ordinal engine index; not a probability or appraisal.

Public-source coverage

8/8dimensions with public data. It measures coverage, not official approval or probability of success.

Reading

Verify first

Scoop

Cooling

Risk pressure

Medium

Why this grade: the signal score · next ceiling: below the quality floor for top grades (risk/confidence/coverage).

🔒 The engine detected cross-signal checks that affect the index. Their detail and impact are in the Evidence Brief.

Algorithm verdictMonitor

No urgency: we keep watching in case the signal shifts. 🔒 Full reasoning in your Evidence Brief.

What would change it: Upgrades with more zone traction or better evidence; we re-check it every sweep.

The analysis, dimension by dimension 8/8 with data · coverage 100% · ⓘ explains what it measures · tap each bar for why

Location / corridorⓘMediumwhy

Where it is and how connected and serviced the zone is.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Land price/m²ⓘLowwhy

Whether the land price/m² fits the zone or you're overpaying.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

ScoopⓘLowwhy

How far ahead of the market you are before the hype arrives.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Land subdividerⓘMediumwhy

Land subdivider track record: do they deliver titles & infrastructure?

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Title & cadastreⓘMediumwhy

Whether the signal carries declared registral identity (registration/cadastre), for you to verify.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Zone tractionⓘLowwhy

Whether the zone is heating up (rising demand).

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Resale liquidityⓘLowwhy

How fast it resells in the zone: whether you can exit.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Lot-supply slackⓘMediumwhy

How much room is left in supply (low = saturated zone, pushes price down).

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

The public view shows bands; the exact number only appears with its drivers and sources in the Evidence Brief. “no data” = no public source for that dimension in this signal (not 0: we don’t make it up). What your Evidence Brief unlocks: traceable sources for each data point, the land subdivider’s identity, exact location and reasoned red flags.

🔒 Developer’s official website, video and brochures/floor plans in your Evidence Brief — they identify the developer.

Location approximate zone · ~5 km radius · exact in Evidence Brief

Source timing

Public environmental source dated ~126 days ago. Its commercial timing still needs a dated match; no lead is assumed. 🔒 Exact source date in your Evidence Brief.

Public evidence (MADES + registry)

Land subdivider🔒 withheld

SignalLoteamiento · environmental signal

Year2025

Cadastral account🔒

Registry entries🔒

Lots0-10

Track record: Land subdividerEstablecida

🔒 Declared documentary identity (Land subdivider + cadastral account + registry entries, when present) — revealed in your Evidence Brief so your notary can cross-check it at the public registry.

Project contact & source

Official website🔒

MADES case file🔒

Source record🔒

Study responsible🔒

🔒 The full identity and sources in your Evidence Brief: land subdivider website, MADES case file and source record, and the environmental study reference. Corporate phone and social links where the public source provides them.

Market · cross-portal data

Comparables in micro-zone3

Zone price/m²U$S 10–14

Portal comparables1 portal · zone

Competing lot supplyMedium

We cross the MADES signal with portal listings from the same micro-zone. Free view shows the price range; the exact median and comparable detail are in your Evidence Brief.

Risk and evidence checks 4/4 ok

No alert · okThe check passes with the public data available.

Risk < 60 · okThe check passes with the public data available.

Coverage ≥ 50 · okThe check passes with the public data available.

Not sponsored · okThe check passes with the public data available.

🔒 What to request to close the failing gates (documents, concrete verifications), in your Evidence Brief.

Zone risk (geo) DEM + OSM + MADES · geo risk weighs on the score

≈

Flood · Mediumderived from elevation + watercourses · geo-data confidence: high · already discounted in the score (ZONE risk, not the developer's)

✓

No nearby env. hazards0 hazard MADES licences in radius (measured)

F

Border strip · ~38 kmrural land: a foreigner can't hold it directly (Law 2532/05)

▲

Elevation · 109 mwatercourse at 1613 m

History · evidence, market and model

First record taken. History builds with each update (signal vs portals vs source).

This is a radar signal

We located it in public sources. To see the lot identity and full evidence, open its Evidence Brief — traceable sources, all 8 exact dimensions and the red flags. See an audited real case →

Declared identityLand subdivider + cadastral account + registry entries, when present

8 exact dimensionsThe exact 0-100 score + the factor behind each (here you only see bands)

Land price analyzedMedian U$S/m² + dispersion + detailed comparables

Risk breakdownWhich gate fails and the risk pressure behind it

Dated source comparisonMADES/portal dates + exact gap when the match is attributable

Lot trackingFull study + score change history

Create an account or sign in to unlock the evidence.

Create account and open · US$24 →

One-time payment, no subscription. Or the Pase (US$49/mo) opens them all.

Anonymised public signal — company name withheld until your Evidence Brief, never personal data. OJOPY is not a broker and does not sell real estate; it does not guarantee returns. The analysis reduces information asymmetry — it does not eliminate risk. Methodology · Legal.