Skip to content

OJOPYSee pricing

CLoteamientoMADES signal: RecentCommercial match: UndeterminedEvidence: Public sources cross-checked

Loteamiento · Paraguay

Signal SUELO-PY-30

Paraguay · identity withheld

Research state and readingResearch state: Compare. Current reading: Compare.

Why this signal deserves a closer look: Recent public trace

Reasons for this reading

4/8 applicable dimensions have public data (53% weighted coverage).
Internal checks raise no critical contradiction in the available sources.
The MADES signal is «Recent MADES».
The commercial match is «Undetermined».

Unresolved gaps

Land price/m²: insufficient public-source evidence.
Zone traction: insufficient public-source evidence.
Resale liquidity: insufficient public-source evidence.
Lot-supply slack: insufficient public-source evidence.
Commercial match: no attributed, dated listing is available.
Comparables: the sample is too small for a micro-zone median.

Next validation: Compare the offered price and terms with valid comparables from the same micro-zone.

What would change the reading: Would move to “Investigate further” with grade A/S, ≥70% documentary confidence and cross-checked public sources.

What OJOPY does not know: OJOPY does not know or validate registry liens, municipal approval, promised services, or contract terms.

🔒 Identity and detailed sources remain reserved for the Evidence Brief.

Create account and open · US$24 → Watch Compare this signal

Signal index

44/100

Ordinal engine index; not a probability or appraisal.

Public-source coverage

4/8 dimensions with public data. It measures coverage, not official approval or probability of success.

Reading

Look, with reservations

MADES signal

Recent MADESMADES date and traceable source available in the Evidence Brief.

Commercial match

UndeterminedNo attributed, dated commercial listing has been matched.

Risk pressure

Medium

Why this grade: the signal score · next ceiling: below the quality floor for top grades (risk/confidence/coverage).

The analysis, dimension by dimension 4/8 with data · coverage 53% · ⓘ explains what it measures · tap each bar for why

Location / corridorⓘMediumwhy

Observed access, services, and micro-zone context.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Land price/m²ⓘno datawhy

No public source for this dimension in this signal — that’s why it shows “no data”, not 0 (we don’t make it up).

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Timing contextⓘLowwhy

Timing contribution to the index; MADES recency and commercial matching keep separate states.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Land subdividerⓘMediumwhy

Land subdivider public record in the sources consulted.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Title & cadastreⓘMediumwhy

Whether the signal carries declared registral identity (registration/cadastre), for you to verify.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Zone tractionⓘno datawhy

No public source for this dimension in this signal — that’s why it shows “no data”, not 0 (we don’t make it up).

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Resale liquidityⓘno datawhy

No public source for this dimension in this signal — that’s why it shows “no data”, not 0 (we don’t make it up).

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Lot-supply slackⓘno datawhy

No public source for this dimension in this signal — that’s why it shows “no data”, not 0 (we don’t make it up).

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

The public view already shows the global ordinal index; the Evidence Brief adds per-dimension factors and the sources that exist. “no data” = no public source for that dimension in this signal (not 0: we don’t make it up). What your Evidence Brief unlocks: the traceable sources available for this capture, the declared land subdivider identity, exact location when present, and reasoned flags.

In this micro-zone we haven’t yet crossed portal comparables — that’s why price, zone traction, resale liquidity and lot saturation show no data. This is coverage, not a flaw in the lot: the MADES signal and location are present, and confidence is adjusted down accordingly.

Location approximate zone · ~5 km radius · exact in Evidence Brief

Documented chronology

MADES signalRecent MADESMADES date and traceable source available in the Evidence Brief.

Commercial matchUndeterminedNo attributed, dated commercial listing has been matched.

Commercial timing remains undetermined until an attributed, dated listing is matched. Zone comparables do not establish this project's commercial chronology.

🔒 Traceable dates and sources in your Evidence Brief.

Public evidence (MADES + registry)

Land subdivider🔒 withheld

SignalLoteamiento · environmental signal

Year2026

Cadastral account🔒

Registry entries🔒

Lots—

Public record of the Land subdividerEstablecida

🔒 Declared documentary identity (Land subdivider + cadastral account + registry entries, when present) — revealed in your Evidence Brief so your notary can cross-check it at the public registry.

Project contact & source

Official website🔒

MADES case file🔒

Source record🔒

Study responsible🔒

🔒 The full identity and sources in your Evidence Brief: land subdivider website, MADES case file and source record, and the environmental study reference. Corporate phone and social links where the public source provides them.

Internal risk and evidence checks

Engine: state is not Alert · criterion metWith the public evidence observed, the result meets this internal criterion; it does not certify the project.

Risk < 60 · criterion metWith the public evidence observed, the result meets this internal criterion; it does not certify the project.

Coverage ≥ 50 · criterion metWith the public evidence observed, the result meets this internal criterion; it does not certify the project.

Not sponsored · criterion metWith the public evidence observed, the result meets this internal criterion; it does not certify the project.

🔒 What to request to review internal criteria that are not met (documents and concrete checks), in your Evidence Brief.

Zone risk (geo) DEM + OSM + MADES · geo risk weighs on the score

≈

Flood · Mediumderived from elevation + watercourses · geo-data confidence: high · already discounted in the score (ZONE risk, not the developer's)

✓

No nearby env. hazards0 hazard MADES licences in radius (measured)

▲

Elevation · 279 mwatercourse at 526 m

History · evidence, market and model

First record taken. History builds with each update (signal vs portals vs source).

This is a radar signal

We located it in public sources. Open its Evidence Brief to see the paid fields that actually exist for this capture, while every missing item remains explicit. See an audited real case →

Declared project and developer identityLand subdivider, project name, and registry identifiers when present.

Traceable source for every data pointLinks and references actually present in this capture.

A reading of each dimension and its observed factorsBreakdown of 4/8 applicable dimensions with data; missing evidence stays marked.

Contradictions and reasoned flagsEvidence behind risk pressure and every internal criterion not met.

Missing data + questions for the seller / notaryCompare the offered price and terms with valid comparables from the same micro-zone.

History availablePreserved changes to this signal and its reading.

Create your account or sign in before paying.This binds the brief to the right account and prevents duplicate charges.

Create account and continue · US$24 →

Already have an account? Sign in. Or the Pase (US$49/mo) opens them all.

Material-error guarantee: if a data point we gave as verified against its public source was wrong and changes the reading, we fix it free; if it invalidates the Brief, we refund your US$24.

Anonymised public signal — company name withheld until your Evidence Brief, never personal data. OJOPY is not a broker and does not sell real estate; it does not guarantee returns. The analysis reduces information asymmetry — it does not eliminate risk. Methodology · Legal.