See the radar
Evidence Brief · example

Evidence Brief

The dossier that unlocks each signal. Simulated data to show the format: public sources and proprietary data only, never client documents.

ProjectEdificio residencial en Asunción
DeveloperIdentity found in public sources
Signal score62 / 100
Source · detectionMADES/SIAM · registro ambiental público

Executive summary

Detected in MADES, which usually precedes the portals. Location and first-seen work in its favor; zone price and registry evidence work against it. The verdict is algorithmic and reflects only what can be read from public sources: evidence still needs verifying before moving forward.

Red flags

  • The MADES filing covers a preliminary phase: the full building scope is not yet in the public record.
  • No public record of an approved construction permit for this address.
  • The developer’s public track record is thin: few verifiable completed projects.
  • The observed zone price sits at the high end of the micro-zone range.

Project and developer identity

Linked entityWithheld in this example
Public track recordPartial

In the real Evidence Brief, this section shows the identity the engine assembles from the environmental registry (MADES) and the official website, with the registry identifiers declared in the filing (registration number/cadastral account, to verify with your notary): which entity is behind it, which public projects are attributed to them, and how verifiable their track record is. In this project the developer’s public trail is thin.

Sources

The entire brief comes from public sources and proprietary data. Never from client documents.

MADES/SIAMPublic environmental registry — source of the early construction detection.
Registry identity (declared)Registration number, cadastral account and finca as stated in the MADES filing — to verify with your notary, not checked by us.
Market listingsZone price and comparable supply in the micro-zone (portals and aggregators).
Airbnb · BookingShort-stay rental observed in the zone (occupancy and average rate).
Developer's official websiteAnnounced scope, render and timeline declared by the developer.

The dimensions

The exact 0–100 score for each dimension, with the factor behind it.

Location71 · highHigh-traction micro-zone; services and connectivity above average.
Scoop84 · highDetected in MADES, which usually precedes the portals.
Short-stay rent55 · midAirbnb + Booking in the micro-zone; average seasonal occupancy.
Developer41 · midThin public track record; few verifiable completed projects.
Registry evidence29 · lowNo public record of an approved construction permit.
Market traction60 · midZone searches and listings in steady growth.
Resale liquidity44 · midSlower resale at the high end of the zone’s price range.
Supply slack52 · midModerate competition in the zone; some supply slack remains.

Missing data

What can’t be read from public sources and still needs verifying.

  • Approved construction permit for this address (no public record).
  • Clear identity of the legal entity that would sign the contract.
  • Registered title of the property and any encumbrances (not open public information).
  • Construction timeline verifiable against the registry stage.
  • Real guarantees and penalties, beyond the marketing material.

Questions for your lawyer or notary

Copy these and bring them to the seller, your lawyer and your notary.

  1. Which legal entity signs the contract, and does it match the business registry?
  2. Is there an approved construction permit for this address? Ask for the number.
  3. Ask the notary for the registered title and status of any encumbrances and charges.
  4. Is the deposit refundable, and under what conditions? Get it in writing.
  5. Which projects has the developer completed, and where can they be verified?
  6. Does the construction timeline match the stage shown in the environmental registry?
  7. Does the advertised return include vacancy, maintenance, taxes and commissions?
  8. Ask your lawyer about the ownership structure and taxes applicable to the transaction.

Radar verdict

Signal score 62 · partial evidence

Early signal with potential, but registry evidence still needs confirming. The verdict is algorithmic; it is never a buy recommendation. Take the questions above to the seller and your notary before moving forward.

This is what you see when you unlock a radar signal.Explore early signals and unlock the evidence on the project that interests you.
View radar →Unlock evidence

Sample Evidence Brief with simulated data, based solely on public sources and proprietary data. OJOPY is not a broker and does not sell property, does not guarantee returns, and the verdict is algorithmic: it reduces information asymmetry, does not eliminate risk, and does not replace your lawyer or notary. Legal.