Skip to content
See the radar
DEdificio residencialScoop: CoolingEvidence: Public sources cross-checked

Edificio residencial · OTHER

Signal PUB-PY-35

OTHER · identity withheld

Signal index
27/100
Ordinal engine index; not a probability or appraisal.
Public-source coverage
5/8dimensions with public data. It measures coverage, not official approval or probability of success.
Reading
Verify first
Scoop
Cooling
Risk pressure
Medium

Why this grade: the signal score · next ceiling: no geolocation.

Algorithm verdictMonitor

No urgency: we keep watching in case the signal shifts. 🔒 Full reasoning in your Evidence Brief.

What would change it: Upgrades with more zone traction or better evidence; we re-check it every sweep.

Watch Compare

The analysis, dimension by dimension 5/8 with data · coverage 81% · ⓘ explains what it measures · tap each bar for why

LocationⓘMediumwhy

Where it is and how connected and serviced the zone is.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

ScoopⓘLowwhy

How far ahead of the market you are before the hype arrives.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Short-stay rentⓘinsufficient local dataLowwhy

Short-stay rental potential (Airbnb/Booking) in the zone.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

DeveloperⓘMediumwhy

Developer track record: do they deliver or vanish?

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Public documentary trailⓘMediumwhy

Whether there's a real case file, permits and entity (anti-hype).

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Market tractionⓘno datawhy

No public source for this dimension in this signal — that’s why it shows “no data”, not 0 (we don’t make it up).

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Resale liquidityⓘno datawhy

No public source for this dimension in this signal — that’s why it shows “no data”, not 0 (we don’t make it up).

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Supply slackⓘno datawhy

No public source for this dimension in this signal — that’s why it shows “no data”, not 0 (we don’t make it up).

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

The public view shows bands; the exact number only appears with its drivers and sources in the Evidence Brief. “no data” = no public source for that dimension in this signal (not 0: we don’t make it up). What your Evidence Brief unlocks: traceable sources for each data point, the developer’s identity, exact location and reasoned red flags.

In this micro-zone we haven’t yet crossed portal comparables — that’s why market traction, liquidity and saturation show no data. This is coverage, not a flaw in the project: the MADES signal and location are present, and confidence is adjusted down accordingly.

Public evidence (MADES + registry)

Developer🔒 withheld
SignalConstrucción nueva · additional construction trail
Year2025
Cadastral account🔒
Registry entries🔒
Units—
Track record: DeveloperActiva

🔒 Declared documentary identity (Developer + cadastral account + registry entries, when present) — revealed in your Evidence Brief so your notary can cross-check it at the public registry.

Project contact & source

Official website🔒
MADES case file🔒
Source record🔒
Study responsible🔒

🔒 The full identity and sources in your Evidence Brief: developer website, MADES case file and source record, and the environmental study reference. Corporate phone and social links where the public source provides them.

Risk and evidence checks 4/4 ok

No alert · okThe check passes with the public data available.
Risk < 60 · okThe check passes with the public data available.
Coverage ≥ 50 · okThe check passes with the public data available.
Not sponsored · okThe check passes with the public data available.

🔒 What to request to close the failing gates (documents, concrete verifications), in your Evidence Brief.

History · evidence, market and model

  1. Jul 03Recalibración del modelo (v1 → v2): los cambios de esta corrida reflejan el motor, no el mercado

🔒 4 recorded changes — the project tracking (full change history) is in your Evidence Brief.

This is a radar signal

We located it in public sources. To see the project identity and full evidence, open its Evidence Brief — traceable sources, all 8 exact dimensions and the red flags. See an audited real case →

Declared identityDeveloper + cadastral account + registry entries, when present
8 exact dimensionsThe exact 0-100 score + the factor behind each (here you only see bands)
Price analyzedMedian U$S/m² + dispersion + detailed comparables
Risk breakdownWhich gate fails and the risk pressure behind it
Dated source comparisonMADES/portal dates + exact gap when the match is attributable
Project trackingFull study + score change history
Create an account or sign in to unlock the evidence.
Create account and open · US$24 →

One-time payment, no subscription. Or the Pase (US$49/mo) opens them all.

Anonymised public signal — company name withheld until your Evidence Brief, never personal data. OJOPY is not a broker and does not sell real estate; it does not guarantee returns. The analysis reduces information asymmetry — it does not eliminate risk. Methodology · Legal.