Skip to content
See access
DBarrio cerradoMADES signal: Very recentCommercial match: UndeterminedEvidence: Public sources cross-checked

Barrio cerrado · Filadelfia

Signal PUB-PY-02

Filadelfia · identity withheld

Why this signal deserves a closer lookNew public MADES trace

Operational reading: Monitor. No urgency: we keep watching in case the signal shifts. 🔒 Open the full reasoning and its sources in the Evidence Brief.

What would change the reading: Upgrades with more zone traction or better evidence; we re-check it every sweep.

Signal index
50/100
Ordinal engine index; not a probability or appraisal.
Public-source coverage
5/8 dimensions with public data. It measures coverage, not official approval or probability of success.
Reading
Verify first
MADES signal
Very recent MADESMADES date and traceable source available in the Evidence Brief.
Commercial match
UndeterminedNo attributed, dated commercial listing has been matched.
Risk pressure
Low

Why this grade: no geolocation · no portal pricing in the area · few dimensions with data.

The analysis, dimension by dimension 5/8 with data · coverage 81% · ⓘ explains what it measures · tap each bar for why

LocationMediumwhy

Where it is and how connected and serviced the zone is.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Timing contextMediumwhy

Timing contribution to the index; MADES recency and commercial matching keep separate states.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Short-stay rentinsufficient local dataLowwhy

Short-stay rental potential (Airbnb/Booking) in the zone.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

DeveloperMediumwhy

Developer public record: activity and background visible in the sources.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Public documentary trailHighwhy

Traceable filings, declarations and business identity.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Market tractionno datawhy

No public source for this dimension in this signal — that’s why it shows “no data”, not 0 (we don’t make it up).

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Resale liquidityno datawhy

No public source for this dimension in this signal — that’s why it shows “no data”, not 0 (we don’t make it up).

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Supply slackno datawhy

No public source for this dimension in this signal — that’s why it shows “no data”, not 0 (we don’t make it up).

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

The public view shows bands; the exact number only appears with its drivers and sources in the Evidence Brief. “no data” = no public source for that dimension in this signal (not 0: we don’t make it up). What your Evidence Brief unlocks: traceable sources for each data point, the developer’s identity, exact location and reasoned red flags.

In this micro-zone we haven’t yet crossed portal comparables — that’s why market traction, liquidity and saturation show no data. This is coverage, not a flaw in the project: the MADES signal and location are present, and confidence is adjusted down accordingly.

Documented chronology
MADES signalVery recent MADESMADES date and traceable source available in the Evidence Brief.
Commercial matchUndeterminedNo attributed, dated commercial listing has been matched.

Commercial timing remains undetermined until an attributed, dated listing is matched. Zone comparables do not establish this project's commercial chronology.

🔒 Traceable dates and sources in your Evidence Brief.

Public evidence (MADES + registry)

Developer🔒 withheld
SignalConstrucción nueva · additional construction trail
Year2026
Cadastral account🔒
Registry entries🔒
Units
Public record of the DeveloperEstablecida

🔒 Declared documentary identity (Developer + cadastral account + registry entries, when present) — revealed in your Evidence Brief so your notary can cross-check it at the public registry.

Project contact & source

Official website🔒
MADES case file🔒
Source record🔒
Study responsible🔒

🔒 The full identity and sources in your Evidence Brief: developer website, MADES case file and source record, and the environmental study reference. Corporate phone and social links where the public source provides them.

Risk and evidence checks 4/4 ok

No critical flag · okThe check passes with the public data available.
Risk < 60 · okThe check passes with the public data available.
Coverage ≥ 50 · okThe check passes with the public data available.
Not sponsored · okThe check passes with the public data available.

🔒 What to request to close the failing gates (documents, concrete verifications), in your Evidence Brief.

Zone risk (geo) DEM + OSM + MADES · geo risk weighs on the score

Flood · Mediumderived from elevation + watercourses · geo-data confidence: high · already discounted in the score (ZONE risk, not the developer's)
No nearby env. hazards0 hazard MADES licences in radius (measured)
Elevation · 140 mwatercourse at 1060 m

History · evidence, market and model

First record taken. History builds with each update (signal vs portals vs source).

This is a radar signal

We located it in public sources. To see the project identity and full evidence, open its Evidence Brief — traceable sources, all 8 exact dimensions and the red flags. See an audited real case →

Declared identityDeveloper + cadastral account + registry entries, when present
8 exact dimensionsThe exact 0-100 score + the factor behind each (here you only see bands)
Price analyzedMedian U$S/m² + dispersion + detailed comparables
Risk breakdownWhich gate fails and the risk pressure behind it
Dated source comparisonMADES/portal dates + exact gap when the match is attributable
Project trackingFull study + score change history
Create an account or sign in to unlock the evidence.
Create account and open · US$24 →

One-time payment, no subscription. Or the Pase (US$49/mo) opens them all.

Anonymised public signal — company name withheld until your Evidence Brief, never personal data. OJOPY is not a broker and does not sell real estate; it does not guarantee returns. The analysis reduces information asymmetry — it does not eliminate risk. Methodology · Legal.