See the radar
DLoteamientoScoop: EmergingEvidence: Public sources cross-checked

Loteamiento · Caaguazú

Signal SUELO-PY-29

Caaguazú · identity withheld

Signal index
39/100▼8
Ordinal engine index; not a probability or appraisal.
Public-source coverage
5/8dimensions with public data. It measures coverage, not official approval or probability of success.
Reading
Verify first
Scoop
Emerging
Risk pressure
Medium

Why this grade: the signal score · next ceiling: below the quality floor for top grades (risk/confidence/coverage).

🔒 The engine detected cross-signal checks that affect the index. Their detail and impact are in the Evidence Brief.

Algorithm verdictMonitor

No urgency: we keep watching in case the signal shifts. 🔒 Full reasoning in your Evidence Brief.

What would change it: Upgrades with more zone traction or better evidence; we re-check it every sweep.

Watch Compare

The analysis, dimension by dimension 5/8 with data · coverage 58% · ⓘ explains what it measures · tap each bar for why

Location / corridorⓘMediumwhy

Where it is and how connected and serviced the zone is.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Land price/m²ⓘno datawhy

No public source for this dimension in this signal — that’s why it shows “no data”, not 0 (we don’t make it up).

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

ScoopⓘMediumwhy

How far ahead of the market you are before the hype arrives.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Land subdividerⓘMediumwhy

Land subdivider track record: do they deliver titles & infrastructure?

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Title & cadastreⓘMediumwhy

Whether the signal carries declared registral identity (registration/cadastre), for you to verify.

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Zone tractionⓘLowwhy

Whether the zone is heating up (rising demand).

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Resale liquidityⓘno datawhy

No public source for this dimension in this signal — that’s why it shows “no data”, not 0 (we don’t make it up).

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

Lot-supply slackⓘno datawhy

No public source for this dimension in this signal — that’s why it shows “no data”, not 0 (we don’t make it up).

🔒 The breakdown with traceable sources and reasoned flags, in your Evidence Brief.

The public view shows bands; the exact number only appears with its drivers and sources in the Evidence Brief. “no data” = no public source for that dimension in this signal (not 0: we don’t make it up). What your Evidence Brief unlocks: traceable sources for each data point, the land subdivider’s identity, exact location and reasoned red flags.

In this micro-zone we haven’t yet crossed portal comparables — that’s why price, resale liquidity and lot saturation show no data. This is coverage, not a flaw in the lot: the MADES signal and location are present, and confidence is adjusted down accordingly.

Location approximate zone · ~5 km radius · exact in Evidence Brief

Scoop

Early signal via MADES · detected ~37 days ago, which typically precedes portal listings. 🔒 Exact detection date in your Evidence Brief.

Public evidence (MADES + registry)

Land subdivider🔒 withheld
SignalLoteamiento · environmental signal
Year2026
Cadastral account🔒
Registry entries🔒
Lots—
Track record: Land subdividerActiva

🔒 Registry identity (Land subdivider + cadastral account + registry entries) — revealed in your Evidence Brief. These are the keys to the public registry — they unlock together when you open it.

Project contact & source

Official website🔒
MADES case file🔒
Source record🔒
Study responsible🔒

🔒 The full lead in your Evidence Brief: land subdivider website, MADES case file and source record, and environmental study responsible — the route to the lot. Phone and social, where the source provides them.

Risk and evidence checks 4/4 ok

Alert · okThe check passes with the public data available.
Risk · okThe check passes with the public data available.
Evidence · okThe check passes with the public data available.
Organic · okThe check passes with the public data available.

🔒 What to request to close the failing gates (documents, concrete verifications), in your Evidence Brief.

Zone risk (geo) DEM + OSM + MADES · geo risk weighs on the score

≈
Flood · Mediumderived from elevation + watercourses · geo-data confidence: high · already discounted in the score (ZONE risk, not the developer's)
✓
No nearby env. hazards0 hazard MADES licences in radius (measured)
▲
Elevation · 324 mwatercourse at 488 m

History · evidence, market and model

  1. Jul 03Recalibración del modelo (v1 → v2): los cambios de esta corrida reflejan el motor, no el mercado

🔒 15 recorded changes — the project tracking (full change history) is in your Evidence Brief.

This is a radar signal

We caught it early from public sources. To see the lot identity and full evidence, open the Evidence Brief — traceable sources, all 8 exact dimensions and the red flags. See an example →

Registry identityLand subdivider + cadastral account + registry entries
8 exact dimensionsThe exact 0-100 score + the factor behind each (here you only see bands)
Land price analyzedMedian U$S/m² + dispersion + detailed comparables
Risk breakdownWhich gate fails and the risk pressure behind it
Exact first-seen dateMADES/portal dates + precise days of lead time
Lot trackingFull study + score change history
Create an account or sign in to unlock the evidence.
Create account and open · US$24 →

One-time payment, no subscription. Or the Pase (US$49/mo) opens them all.

Anonymised public signal — company name withheld until your Evidence Brief, never personal data. OJOPY is not a broker and does not sell real estate; it does not guarantee returns. The analysis reduces information asymmetry — it does not eliminate risk. Methodology · Legal.